Women's Rights

I. The Women of the Burleigh Family - by Birth 

(Frances) Mary Burleigh (Ames) is the only surviving daughter among the core generation of siblings. However, she was also the oldest of the siblings, and universally beloved by her brothers. It is Mary who first endorses the Canterbury Female Academy by joining the Crandall sisters as a co-teacher. She is a co-founder and officer of the Brooklyn (Connecticut) Female Anti-Slavery Society, started when the Canterbury Academy was still flourishing, but continuing through the 1830s. Mary appears to have remained active in it through its known life span. There is also a tantalizing hint that she joined some of the Boston conversations with the Alcotts in the 1840s. When she and her husband Jesse Ames moved to Vineland, New Jersey in the 1860s and 1870s, that semi-utopic settlement was a hotbed of Woman Suffrage activity.

While the evidence assembled concerning Mary Burleigh feels whispy, like sand slipping through the fingers, it is also consistent with the profile of a Woman's Right activist. It seems possible that her constant domestic duties and elder care took her away from activism for much of the 1850s and 1860s (a situation parallel to that of Prudence Crandall, who had moved to Illinois). The search will continue.

Mary Burleigh Brooklyn FASS 1837

Mary Burleigh and the Brooklyn Female Anti-Slavery Society

Brooklyn Female Anti-Slavery Society

The mother of the Burleigh core siblings, Lydia Bradford Burleigh, is, as documented on her page, a profound influence on her children and their activism. While she is remembered with deep love by her children, a hint of how she lived a life of moral fortitude and a progressive vision can be discerned in the memorials offered by her son Charles, when he wrote in his obituary letter on her: 

if her spirit could speak to me from its new abode, it would say to me, ‘Return to your work, and show your reverence for my memory by being true to the principles I instilled into you from infancy upward.’

Similarly, the dedicatory page of the posthumous edition of William Burleigh's poetry, edited by Celia Burleigh, pays homage to the moral guidance of Lydia Bradford Burleigh. It is not clear if it was William's idea, or Celia's, but to dedicate a book at the moment of your death, to your mother who has been gone for nearly twenty years, is not a common sentiment. Compare, for instance, the other more famed nineteenth-century Connecticut family - the Beechers. As talented, literate, and learnéd as Roxana Foote Beecher was, her talented children refer back to their father far more often than they do to her. The opposite is the case with the Burleigh family. As said on another page, the Burleigh siblings respected their father, but loved their mother, and mention her influence with far greater frequency than their father. While we cannot contend, from the available evidence, that Lydia Bradford Burleigh was in favor of Women's Rights per se, the image of an intellectually and morally powerful woman as the center of the Burleigh household, and as the source of her children's activism, means that the core generation of Burleigh siblings could not deny women's importance and centrality to the struggle without denying their own experience. 

II. The Men of the Burleigh Family move toward Pro-Feminism

Many pro-feminist men come to support women's rights through observing the restrictions placed on the strong women in their own families. This is true of the men of the Burleigh family. Their mother Lydia, and their oldest sibling, Mary, were strong female figures in their lives. Despite this, though, the process for the men, towards embracing women's rights, was uneven.

Charles Calistus Burleigh, perhaps because of his strong affiliation with Garrisonianism, and his work with Abby Kelley Foster, was among the earliest to endorse women's rights. He is active in the American Equal Rights Association in the aftermath of the Civil War. His marriage to the Quaker-raised Gertrude Kimber Burleigh, and his extensive time working with Quaker abolitionists in Pennsylvania, brought him to further appreciate the intellectual and oratorical powers of women. He attended women's suffrage conventions after the Civil War.

Cyrus Moses Burleigh likewise adopted the Garrisonian line, and, like Charles, interacted extensively with the Philadelphia Quaker Abolitionists. Throughout his journals, his comments on women always look to their minds and moral fortitude, rather than their looks, or emotional sentimentality. His end-of-life interactions with Mary Grew and Margaret Jones, described elsewhere, point to an incipient understanding of queer gender dynamics.

William Henry Burleigh's first marriage appeared to be conventional, and little is heard of any public profile for Harriet. But his second wife, Celia Burleigh, is a major activist for women's rights, suffrage, and public speaking. She is most famous as a co-founder of the first woman's club, Sorosis, and as the first female Unitarian minister to hold a pulpit - that being in Brooklyn, Connecticut. Her influence on William's embrace of women's rights was vast.

George Shepard Burleigh, being a poet, always had references to women in his work - that range from the most conventional and sentimental, to genuinely empowering. His marriage to Ruth Burgess Burleigh also aided his recognition of women as agents of change. He often returned to the theme of girls, seeing great promise in their pluck and vision. His most important work of fiction - the serialized short story/novella "Effie Lee" - has two young girls, one white and one Black, as its protagonists. In his later years, his poetry was often addressed to the girls in the neighborhood of his Little Compton, Rhode Island, residence. Further analysis is needed to tease out what he was saying about girls and women, but during the post-Civil War era, he endorsed woman suffrage and woman's rights generally.

The Burleigh team has yet to uncover any solid evidence of explicit support for women's rights by Lucian Rinaldo Burleigh, John Oscar Burleigh, or Jesse Ames, but the research will continue!

 

III. The Women of the Burleigh Family by Marriage

To Be Added Soon!

IV. The Angel of Monterey

The perception of women as morally superior to men was part of the gender ideology of the nineteenth-century. Scholars and present-day feminists often dismiss this as a form of sentimental essentialism. But this erases the profoundly disquieting effect on male supremacy that this moral ideology could have - especially to morally active agents of change like the Burleigh family.

A remarkable convergence of anti-war, anti-imperialism, and proto-feminism, thus occured when news reached the United States of the brave actions of mercy undertaken by Mexican women on the actual battlefield during the Mexican-American War. That war was condemned by Abolitionists and the reform movements in general; it famously bequeathed to us Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

John Greenleaf Whitter's 1847 poem "The Angels of Buena Vista," exemplifies this convergence: it is one of the most important anti-war poems in his pacifist ouvere, and extols the women who can see the suffering on all sides, and even forget their own misery to tend to the dying of both sides.

Intriguingly, at the same moment, in 1847, George Shepard Burleigh and his older brother William were at the height of their skills as editorialists on the pages of The Charter Oak. While it is not yet clear if this is from George or William's pen, these scathing critique and seething anger at the Mexican-American War burn on the page. While this is admittedly the work of a sentimental nineteenth-century writer, for whom a good martyr narrative has deep emotional appeal, the effect of "Women on the War-Field" remains powerful. The first paragraphs parrot, then eviscerate, claims of Anglo-Saxon superiority. The focus shifts to womanhood - here defined in a standard nineteenth-century American gender ideology. A contrast is made between the American women in Massachusetts who loudly applauded the war effort, and the Mexican women who took their mission of mercy to the actual battlefield. Women are shown to be the only true Christians - an ideal that men, as a class, fall far short of. Women are not on a pedestal here - they are on a battlefield, and show their true humanity while being in extreme danger. Granted, the Burleighs idealized these women, little realizing that many of them were actually fighters, too (soldaderas). Ultimately though, this idealized contrast between bloodthirsty men - and the especially culpable American pro-slavery imperialists (including President Polk) - and women who had some sense of humanity - condemns the male perspective (which, as American white men, the Burleighs were a part of) and elevates the Mexican women. The work that this essay is doing goes well beyond any facile critique of its obvious shortcomings.

Note - the poem opens with some gross mischaraterizations of Mexicans as people. It is not clear, interpretively, if these are used sarcastically, or as a parody of what Americans were saying about their Mexican opponents, or if they represent a misstep by George Shepard Burleigh.

WOMEN ON THE WAR-FIELD.

The Mexicans are a rude and half-savage people, and one would think this pretension was deemed enough to justify the slaughter of her inhabitants. That we may hew down her sons and blow her daughters into shreds, to make room for our heroic race, whose boast is to have sprung from that highly refined stock, the Saxon skull-splitters. There is no other true race of the saints, and of necessity the promise that ‘the saints shall inherit the earth’ belongs to us.

The true measure of a nation’s advance is found in the character of its women, and though we would not make a general contrast between the senoritas of Mexico, and the women of New England, we cannot help noticing the marked difference displayed by some of each class in their relation to this thievish and murderous war.

Yankee women in the old Yankee town of Newburyport — let such be few — made public demonstrations of their approval of murder and rapine, in the presentation of Col. Cushing, of a ring which he bought for himself; and in other ridiculous ceremonies intended to cheer on their townsman to his blood-hound’s work. So much for a portion of the women of New England. Now mark a picture on the other side. We all remember the fate of the ‘ministering angel’ at Monterey, who feeding the faint soldier, and bringing water for his burning lips, was shivered by a gunshot in her work of mercy. Such danger did not deter her fellow countrywomen from following in the awful train of war, to relieve the wounded sufferers, to pour one drop of mercy and love, to quench for a little space the surging hell of war. We hear of two thousand women following their friends and brothers to the terrible storm of death at Buena Vista. After those hireling murderers, whom our recreant Yankee women made fools of themselves to cheer on, had hailed their iron shower of death and wounds into the crowded ranks of men, these ministering angels came to bind the fallen brother’s wounds, and give cool water to the parched lips of the dying.

God bless them, every one. They have human hearts, they are true women, willing to face death, and the worse agony of witnessing the fall of their loved ones, smote through by ball and bayonet, if they might shed a little joy late the failing heart, a little peace on the throbbing brain, or bled in the fast-flowing vigor of some fallen warrior, pale and bloody on the field. Think of it, women that urged the blood-hounds on, and wrought banners to wave over such a red Maelstrom of hell, whether is womanlier, your heartless cheering for idle vanity, or their perilous human work of assuaging the pangs of Death for love’s sakes and the instincts of blessed mercy? They were women, but what are ye?

What private pangs, what social tragedies, must that sense furnish. Two thousand women, on the field of indiscriminate slaughter, that was strewn with three thousand men murdered and wounded, friend and foe, — how many a ghastly face would look up, familiar yet how strange, of friend, and son, and brother. And with what heart-fluttering each noble wife or sister, or dear love, would read the features of the dying there, and seek their own doom in the stony eyes of the slain.

How horrible, to think that nations baptized into the name of Christ should furnish such a scene as this. The blessed law of love, enforced by the life and death and divine authority of the World’s Redeemer, for two thousand years, and yet only in woman’s heart is any home for mercy and great human love.

The meek disciples of that holy name are yet the same mad cut-throats that they were in heathendom. The advance of Christ’s Kingdom beyond barbarism, is shown here chiefly in the art of murder, in engines for the greater slaughter of mankind.

But thank God, for humanity’s sake, that woman’s heart can keep alive the blessed flow of pity and generous philanthropy, even while manhood has gone frenzied with the demon cry of war. Thanks that the great instincts of spontaneous love, alike in all climes and all ages, keep yet their throne in woman’s glorious nature, while even the Rabbis of Religion have debased that revered name to murder’s awful service.

God will not see nature hurled from its sphere by our convulsions, and when war-chaplains and Christ-worshipping assassins, would well nigh teach us utter misanthropy. He saves our hearts from such sad atheism, by revelations of an unquenched fire of love and mercy, kept in secret till this awful hour should fan it into flame. If the wild battle yell of Buena Vista may make one doubt God’s presence in the world — as well it might — those wives and mothers there, doing their blessed work, should re-seat faith upon the throne, and teach us how unquenchably His spirit breathes in His last work, when human suffering calls it into action.

Women on the War-Field

Editorial by George Burleigh (presumed), "Women on the War-Field," in The Charter Oak (Hartford, Connecticut), New Series, v. 2 no. 16 p. 2 (April 22, 1847).

Coming Soon (Adobe Stock Educational License)

More materials will be added to this page in the coming year. Stop back soon!

Bloomers

Bloomers

Bloomers

< Previous page Next page >